Can We Kiss those Fouettés Goodbye?

Last week, in The New York Times survey of “the best of dance” in 2015, Gia Kourlas saluted Misty Copeland, dubbing her “ballet’s new Billy Elliot,” but called her out on her fouetté turns, saying “she needs to fix them.”

Brooklyn Mack and Misty Copeland in Kirk Peterson's SWAN LAKE (Photo: Theo Kossenas)

Brooklyn Mack and Misty Copeland in Kirk Peterson’s SWAN LAKE (Photo: Theo Kossenas)

Amid the vast array of technical foibles and demonstrations of bad taste that littered the ballet landscape in 2015, Misty Copeland’s fouetté turns should not rank very high as a target for sharpshooting critics.

It’s time to bid those 32 fouettés adieu (understanding that we mean any number over eight successive whipping turns – because that’s the threshold at which today’s attention-deficit audiences start yawning and checking their Twitter feeds. And, if you are one of those obsessive balletomanes who entertain themselves by counting the wretched things, you know that few ballerinas actually do 32, because many of them are off the music. Then there are those who throw in the occasional double and triple – because they can, not because the music calls for it.)

Those 32F are now 122 years old and it’s time choreographers started inventing new stuff.

They were no doubt miraculous back in 1893 when Italian firecracker Pierina Legnani introduced them in Cinderella. But now they’ve been in the repertoire for ages, growing mold, and training methods have improved to the point where many dancers without any other outward signs of artistry can pull them off.

Few ballerinas do them acceptably, however.

All the rest should hone their exit strategies – as Misty Copeland did admirably in her maiden outing as Odile with Washington Ballet at the Kennedy Center in April. As Ballet to the People reported, when Copeland’s fouettés started to travel (a no-no in Swan Lake) she switched seamlessly to single pirouettes – each push-off from fifth position a fiery stamp, befitting the seductress Odile, and right on the music.

Other prima ballerinas exit to piqué or chaîné turns. Whatever the strategy, it has to have that air of “I meant to do that.” The replacement step has to be in character and convey the same sensation – either a tornado of malice (Swan Lake) or an expression of euphoria (Don Quixote).

Sara Mearns yielded a textbook example of a weak exit strategy on opening night of Peter Martins’ Swan Lake this past season. She fell out of the fouettés, tried to climb back in, and fell out of them again with a conspicuous bobble. Rarely does re-entry into 32F succeed. In Mearns’ case, the staggering beauty of the rest of her performance diminished the contretemps. She is, after all, one of the greatest living interpreters of the role. She should not have to wrestle with 32F. She could emulate the great Maya Plisetskaya, who ignored them completely, simply replacing them with an electrifying sequence of piqué and chaîné turns en manège. (Mearns’ piqué turns are smoking, as she demonstrated in Liebeslieder Walzer, just a week after Swan Lake.)

Sara Mearns in Peter Martins' SWAN LAKE (Photo: Paul Kolnik)

Sara Mearns in Peter Martins’ SWAN LAKE (Photo: Paul Kolnik)

Check out Plisetskaya’s turns en manège which start at 5:25:

Above all, 32F or their replacements must look as if they spring right out of the music. (A seasoned conductor will attempt to keep pace with an errant ballerina, but there is finite elasticity in an iconic score like Swan Lake.) Ballerinas who treat this episode in the music as a faint suggestion, or as ambient sound, should be called out – it doesn’t matter if they can throw in a triple or cartwheel in the middle. Without musicality, 32F becomes gymnastics, not ballet.

Many ballerinas who manage to stay in the fouettés show signs of strain – spooked faces, hiked shoulders, rigid arms, floppy feet – there is a litany of things that commonly ruin 32F, apart from abandoning the music.

The few who have managed to keep us interested in 32F tend to put their distinctive signature on the sequence. Xiomara Reyes has a captivating way with her fan in Don Q and Natalia Osipova is so damn reckless that we know she is going to push herself off-balance, just for the fun of the challenge. Watch as she does it here at 9:15, then pulls herself right back on top of her leg. Our hearts melt as, inevitably, we forgive her untidiness.

The gold standard was set a generation ago by the fiery Nina Ananiashvili, at a speed few can match today:

Today, Marianela Nuñez slows it down so she has time for doubles, and we have more time to bask in her regal smile:

While Odile’s fouettés are supposed to stay rooted to one spot, Cinderella’s are meant to travel. Here is the incomparable Viengsay Valdes showing how it’s done with the added complication of changing spots (or focus):

And, fresh out of the Vaganova Academy this year, the Mariinsky’s wide-eyed Renata Shakirova makes us think we just might start caring about 32F again: (her turns starts @ 0:30)

angular_momentum

Courtesy the brilliant xkcd: http://xkcd.com/162/

 

1 0 0 0 0
RELATED ARTICLES

12 thoughts on “Can We Kiss those Fouettés Goodbye?

  1. Those fouettés should be sacred and ballerinas SHOULD be scared of them. They’re the Mount Everest of the classical ballet world. If you can’t climb Mount Everest you don’t deserve the prima ballerina title.

  2. Seriously, Marc Roy??? So Maya Plisetskaya doesn’t deserve to be called a prima ballerina, and neither does Sara Mearns or Margot Fonteyn, who only ever managed 27 at the most and sometimes just bailed on the fouettés altogether?

    Ballet to the People misses an important point though. Misty Copeland hasn’t earned the right to skip the fouettés yet, and she knows she hasn’t. She has to OWN the leading roles in the classics first, and she hasn’t performed them enough to do that.

    This is the main problem with ballet companies today: they aren’t developing principal dancers like they used to. Because their seasons are so short, they only do 6 Swan Lakes instead of 16, and they rotate so many dancers through the lead roles (esp. when they import so many guest stars like ABT does) so a dancer like Misty is lucky to get two performances a season. That forces her to guest with other companies to get the experience, and that’s how the whole unfortunate cycle perpetuates itself. Guesting is not the ideal road to mastery. It takes time for a partnership to gel, for the ballerina to be able to trust her partner. And it takes a coach who knows you well to be able to move you to the next level of your game. The Russians get this. So do the French (though with Benjamin Millepied running the show the New York way, maybe this will change.) Look at the huge increase in ballet injuries in the past decade. Even when training is supposed to have gotten so much better, dancers are hurting themselves more frequently – because casting and coaching have deteriorated.

    To say Misty Copeland’s problem is her fouettés is to miss the forest for the trees. Her problem at the moment is that she is not getting the performing experience and the coaching she needs to earn that prima ballerina title. And she’s not alone.

  3. Pingback: Writing Roundup: Dance Bloggers' Choice Of 2015

  4. I love all these videos that you chose. What they prove is that, when the fouettés are done confidently, they look like different steps from dancer to dancer. This is the genius of ballet, even a plain old arabesque is not the same on every dancer, bodies are different, training is different, attack is different.

    And I don’t agree that fouettés have a specific meaning in the dance, it’s really up to the dancer and what she brings to the role, they can be a sign of evil or joy or psychological confusion.

    Your comparison of Sara Mearns’ Odile to Misty Copeland’s is spot on …. you can’t assume that the more seasoned dancer will always have a better solution …. there are so many factors affecting live performance, that’s what makes it so exciting. People who think they are getting their fill of dance by watching bits on Youtube are deluded. Years ago, most people could afford to buy tickets to see all the different Swan Lake casts and we could argue about whose fouettés were the prettiest, the smuggest, the most terrifying, but who can afford that now??

    IMO City Ballet dancers don’t have the stamina for these full length ballets. Their repertory doesn’t prepare them. They can give 110% when they’re on stage for short bursts in a mixed bill, but they aren’t used to the demands of Swan Lake, Giselle, Coppelia, etc. Balanchine’s one-act Swan Lake was fine. They own the world’s greatest franchise, they should stick to it, leave the story ballets to the Russians, ABT, POB, La Scala.

  5. RJ when was the last time you went to see ABT? If you follow their casting in NY and on tour you’ll see that they seem to have wound down their guest star practice except when a principal is injured and they need a big name. Whether this is because of budget or artistic policy doesn’t matter, it’s much better for the local dancers.

    Still, what you say about short seasons and limited opportunities for developing principals is very true. For all the companies.

    Deborah I really doubt any of the companies are going to scale back and limit their repertoire. Those days are gone. They are all trying to appeal to the widest possible audience, so they have to do the fairy tale ballets, and the Balanchine and the Forsythe and the Wheeldon and the Twyla. And the younger ones like Liam Scarlett so they aren’t accused of being behind the times. That’s probably why the injury rate is climbing in all these companies. Not all dancers have the bodies and the training that makes them versatile enough to jump from one style to another.

  6. If Misty can’t get those fouettés, how could she ever perform something like Theme and Variations? The fact that she can’t be bothered to improve them or train is pretty pathetic, although I’m sure she assumes that her target audience doesn’t know a fouetté from a frappe and won’t notice anything missing.

  7. At the Royal Ballet in England, you do 32 fouettés with a double on every fourth turn at least. If Misty Copeland can’t do 32 fouettes she should hardly be counted a professional ballerina. Many more years into her career she could play with the choreography but at this stage she should just get on with it

  8. Calmez-vous. Misty Copeland has done the 32 fouettés. I have seen her do them. I suppose she does not do them every time but neither did Ananiashvili or the other great ballerinas (though I am not old enough to have seen Ananiashvili you can read about it.) These are humans not robots, that is why we are willing to go see Swan Lake and Don Quixote 36,000 times because sometimes magic happens and sometimes disaster happens and both are exciting.

    • Thanks for the report, Paul T. But I won’t see Don Q 36,000 times I don’t care who’s in it. I will however see Swan Lake 36,000 times as long as it’s not the Soviet version with the happy ending in which Odette and Siegfried live happily ever after in a Socialist paradise.

  9. Are you asking the wrong question. Are you counting how many fouettés or back flips Misty Copeland can do or asking whether she is right for certain kinds of roles. Ballet standards are deteriorating because we have superhuman expectations of dancers. In past generations a dancer was a type. A dramatic ballerina or a classical storybook princess ballerina. A modern Jerome Robbins The Cage kind of ballerina or a blank faced Four Temperaments ballerina, and so on. Now for some unclear motive — maybe not wanting to have too many expensive dancers weighing down the payroll?? — ballet companies expect their top dancers to be able to do everything otherwise they don’t get promoted to principal. But truth is very very few dancers are versatile enough to shine in the wide repertoire that ballet companies today think they have to offer. We the audiences are partially to blame, but ballet company managements should also stop deluding themselves.

    • JPdeV, I have seen Misty Copeland so far in about six different soloist and principal roles, in story ballets old and new, and more abstract stuff. Maybe I haven’t seen as much of her as you have, but I don’t see her as one type or another. I think of her mainly as a modern American ballerina in a similar mold as Tiler Peck or Vanessa Zahorian. I gather you think she is not suited to Odette-Odile but not because of her unreliable fouettés.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *